| home : index : ancient Mesopotamia : Babylonian Chronicles : article by Bert van der Spek © | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Astronomical Diary mentioning Gaugamela |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
the battle of Gaugamela (British museum, London) |
Its official
title "Astronomical Diary concerning month VI and VII of the fifth year
of Artašata who is called Darius" may not sound very exciting, but this
is one of the most important cuneiform sources for the eastern campaign
of the Macedonian
king Alexander
the Great. Not only does this Astronomical
Diary describe the omens before the battle of Gaugamela
and the fight itself (on 1 October 331), but it also tells how the "king
of Asia" entered Babylon.
The cuneiform tablets (BM 36761 + BM 36390) are in the British Museum. On this website, a new reading is proposed by Bert van der Spek of the Free University of Amsterdam (Netherlands) and Irving Finkel of the British Museum. Please notice that this is a preliminary version. This web publication is therefore intended to invite suggestions for better readings, comments and interpretations (go here to contact Van der Spek). |
Earlier editions Description Text Translation Commentary (obv.) Commentary (rev.) Reader's edition Literature |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earlier editionsThe Diary concerning month VI (= Ululu = 8 September - 7 October) and month VII (= Tashritu = 8 October - 6 November 331 BCE) has been published before:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
diary describing the battle of Gaugamela (British museum, London; **) |
Description of the tabletThe diary consists of two tablets, which do not join.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Line 12’ may also give a clue. In the gap an astronomical record must have been presented, probably about the moon, which must have taken at least five signs; secondly the price of barley must have been reported. In addition, we cannot be sure whether the scribe mentioned different prices of barley for the beginning, middle and end of the month, or mentioned only one price, and we do not know if he added the formula a-na 1 GÍN KÙ.BABBAR, "for one shekel of silver" (as in line r. 2’). But even if only one price was recorded, the gap needs at least 15 signs. On the basis of line 11’ I suggest that a line could contain at least 40 - 42 signs. The actual amount of signs depends of course to the size of the signs used in a particular line and the possible existence of blank spaces with the information he-pi (= "broken" (on the original tablet)) in superscript, as in ll. 3’, 5’ and 6’; cf. rev. 10’. I have collated the historical sections only; in the astronomical section I follow the edition of H. Hunger with minor alterations. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Babylonian Chronicles |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||