| |
Notes
1.
The month name can equally be read DU6
(VII = Tašrîtu)
or ŠU (IV = Du'uzu).
Since, however, in Astronomical
diaries III, p. 27, No. -162 Rev. 11-12,
it is stated that the politai went out from Babylon
in month V, they cannot have returned a month before, as is reported in
this chronicle (l. 12). Hence, the reading Tašrîtu must be considered
practically certain.
2.
lúIa-’-man-na-a-a-ni,
"Greeks", written over an erasure.
4.
"who anoint with oil" = aleiphómenoi
(from aleiphô, to anoint with oil) = youths undergoing gymnastic
training (LSJ sv. aleiphô; suggestion professor Onno van Nijf,
Groningen). Membership of a gymnasium was a mark of citizenship in the
Greek world.
7.
lúšá-kin (šá
LUGAL), "the appointee [prefect; governor; stadholder] (of the king)".
It is not quite clear what this title represents. He was not the satrap,
since that title is rendered in Akkadian as lúGAL.UKKIN
= muma’’ir. Del Monte argues that he was the governor of the royal
slaves (arad šarrâni) in Babylonia.
Del Monte (1997, 38-9, 76-7, 86-7, 96-7) discerns
three population groups in Babylon each with their own administrative institutions.
-
The Babylonian citizens (DUMU.MEŠ E.KI, mârê
Bâbili) under the šatammu
and kiništu
of the temple.
-
The Greek citizens (politai, puli&ê
or puli&ânu), under the authority of the “governor of
Babylon” (pâhât E.KI = in my view the equivalent of
the Greek term epistatês).
-
The royal slaves (lúÌR.MEŠ
LUGAL, arad šarrâni) led by "the prefect of the king" (šaknu
ša šarri).
The distinction is neatly made in an astronomical
diary relating a census held in 145 BC (king Demetrius
II): "That month, at the com[mand of A]r-daya (=Arridaeus?), the general
(= stratêgos) of Babylonia, they made a counting [... o]f
the Babylonians (lúE.KI.MEŠ), the slaves of the king
(lúÌR.MEŠ LUGAL) [and of the] politai,
who were in Babylon and Seleucia” (AD III, p. 97, No. -144 [Obv. Month
VII 167 SE
= 22 Sept. - 20 Oct. 145 BCE]).
As a matter of fact even more population groups
may be discerned.
-
"The people of the land" (lúUN.MEŠ
KUR, nišê mâti) probably refers to the indigenous population
living in the countryside, in Greek texts referred to as laoi; a
parallel may be seen in the much discussed Hebrew term ‘am hâ-’
âre@.
-
The temple slaves (širkê).
I find Del Monte’s ideas fruitful, though I suggest
a few adaptations. The "prefect of the king" is apparently somehow related
to the "people of the land", as may be derived from line 7 and from AD
III, p. 27, No. -162 Rev. 15. Hence he may have been the governor of the
people living in the villages outside the jurisdiction of the cities, the
laoi
and the laoi basilikoi. On the other hand, since this function is
only mentioned in the first years of Antiochus
V Eupator, he may also have been Philip, the regent of Antiochus V.
Antiochus
IV Epiphanes died in month IX 148 SE
= December 164 BCE and was succeeded by his minor son Antiochus V. Antiochus
IV appointed on his deathbed a certain Philip regent, although earlier
Antiochus V was entrusted to Lysias (1
Maccabees, 6:14
en 55; Josephus,
Jewish
Antiquities 12.360-1). Lysias, however, defeated Philip swiftly
in ca. 162 (1
Maccabees, 6:63; 2
Maccabees, 9:29;
Josephus,
Jewish
Antiquities 12.379, 386, 389). Another option is Timarchus,
who was satrap of Babylonia according to Appian
(Syriaca,
47)
or "Generalstatthalter des Ostens" in the interpretation of Bengtson (1944:
86-88).
8.
lúERÍN.MEŠ: restoration
based on AD III, p. 26, no. –162 rev. 11.
10.
l[ú]/bu??-le?
\-e, "boulê". The reconstruction
is hazardous, though the traces conform to it. The word boulê,
however, is attested nowhere else in the cuneiform corpus, so that far
reaching conclusions regarding this passage must await confirmation of
other texts.
|
|