|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hannibal in the Alps |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() A beardless Melqart on a coin of Hannibal (©!!) |
The Carthaginian
general Hannibal
(247-182 BCE) was one of the greatest military leaders in history. His
most famous campaign took place during the Second Punic War (218-202),
when he caught the Romans off guard by crossing the Alps.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Map of the western Alps, showing several possible locations of Hannibal's crossing of the Alps. |
Hannibal's
route across the Alps is one of those historical questions that cause
endless
debate even though the subject has no importance whatsoever. This does
not prevent us, however, from enjoying the puzzle and adding some extra
speculations.
There are two ancient texts that give a description of Hannibal's route. The oldest is in the third book of the World History by the Greek historian Polybius of Megalopolis (ca.200-118 BCE). At first sight, this text seems to describe a rather northerly route, because it mentions a Celtic tribe, the Allobroges, which lived on the banks of the river Isère in the second century BCE. The other source is the twenty-first book of the History of Rome from its Foundation, written by Polybius' Roman colleague Titus Livius of Padua, better known to English readers as Livy (59 BCE-17 CE). He suggests a more southerly route. Both texts can be found here. Livy and Polybius indirectly used the same eyewitness account. This may have been written by one of Hannibal's companions, Sosylus of Lacedaemon, who is known to have written a history of the Second Punic War in seven books. Polybius used the original text; Livy knew it indirectly. His real source cannot be identified, but we can be confident that this intermediary was a careful author, who meticulously copied all the chronological indications he found in the eyewitness report. He also added explanations; that these are correct can not be known, but Livy's chronology is precise: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Roman helmet from the age of the Second Punic War (British Museum) |
Although
Livy's chronology is very detailed, there remain certain
obscure aspects in his narrative. Polybius understands the military
situation
better. For example, he explains at the beginning of his story why the
Celtic tribes had not attacked Hannibal before he started his crossing
of the Alps. So long as the Carthaginians
had remained in the plains the various chieftains of the Allobroges had
left them alone because of their fear both of the Carthaginian cavalry
and also of the barbarian troops who were escorting them.
Explanations like these are absent from Livy's story. Besides, Polybius
writes thatI have questioned
men who were actually present
on these occasions
about the circumstances, have personally explored the country, and have
crossed the Alps myself to obtain first-hand information and evidence.
[World
history, 3.48.2]
It is therefore tempting to regard Polybius as more reliable than Livy. He has first-hand knowledge of the Alps, has read the original eyewitness account, and understands army maneuvers. On the other hand, Livy has his qualities too, because he carefully copies what had been carefully copied. As a consequence, we cannot choose either of these historical texts as 'most reliable'. Another approach of the problem is to look at the passes in the Alps, and to find out which one suits the texts best. From north to south, these passes are:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Col du Montgenèvre |
The only
pass that fits all of the five main conditions is also the lowest,
the Col du Montgenèvre between Briançon in France
and Susa
in Italy. There is an extra argument why this pass is the route taken
by
Hannibal: the distances best suit the distances mentioned by Polybius
(252
kilometers from the Rhône to the beginning of the ascent, and
from
there to the plain of the Po 216 kilometers).
Now that we know that Hannibal crossed the Alps between Briançon and Susa, we can try to find the other stations of his march. The enemy town that was taken on the third day, can easily be identified with modern Gap, because it is a three days' march downstream from Briançon (i.e., days four, five and six). The fort captured by Hannibal's men must be the Mont Saint-Mens (ancient Vapincum), immediately south of the modern town. It is harder to establish the route during the first days. Livy states that Hannibal started his march on the banks of a river called Druentia; this cannot be the Durance, because it is too southerly. The Drôme and Isère are possible, and the first one should be preferred because in that case the distance to Gap can be covered in two or three days. The pass which Hannibal took during the second night, can be identified with the Col de Cabre. (The argument that Hannibal encountered the Allobroges and consequently must have passed along the Isère is not conclusive, because Celtic tribes were not very sedentary. The fact that the Allobroges lived on the banks of the Isère in the second century BCE does not prove that this was their home in the third century.) Probably, Hannibal had always wanted to take the road to the Col du Mont Genèvre. It was a common road and the tribes along it knew the mores of international diplomacy (Polybius mentions how the tribe near the pass came to Hannibal with branches and wreaths, the usual symbols of submission.) However, the Carthaginians had already encountered a Roman army near the Rhône; making a detour along the Drôme and the Col de Cabre, and catching the main road again near Gap, was a diversionary tactic to give the Romans the impression that they had been able to divert him from the road to Italy. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
LiteratureThe arguments in this article were brought forward for the first time by Peter Connolly in his book Hannibal and the Enemies of Rome (1978 London). |
©
Jona Lendering for Livius.Org, 1998 Revision: 16 March 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||