The tyrant Periander
of Corinth (Musei Vaticani,
Roma; ©**)
|
Tyrant:
sole ruler in a Greek city-state, usually an usurper, who held power in
defiance of a city's constitution. Originally, the word did not have
any negative connotations.
The Greek word tyrannos is probably derived from Lydian tûran,
'lord', and simply means 'sole ruler'. The word is neutral, has associations
with wealth and power and can therefore be synonymous with expressions
like basileus, 'king'. For example, the oldest known use of the
word tyrannos is a fragment by the poet Archilochos describing king Gyges
of Lydia
(ruled 680-644).
Yet, in Greek history the tyrant was usually more than just a monarch.
Since the mid-nineteenth century, ancient historians discern two types
of tyranny:
-
The "older" tyrants in mainland Greece of the seventh and sixth centuries.
These people were often dissatisfied aristocrats who managed to seize control
of the state by cooperating with the nouveaux riches: wealthy people
from non-aristocratic families that had until then usually been excluded
from government. Examples are Cypselus and Periander
of Corinth, Pittacus of Mytilene, Pisistratus
of Athens, and Polycrates
of Samos. These tyrannies were a normal phase in Greek history, marking
the end of the old aristocracy and the beginning of oligarchic or even
democratic rule.
-
The "younger" tyrants in the periphery of the Greek
world of the late fifth and fourth centuries. These people tried
to expand the power of their city-states and were in fact creating larger
political units. Example are Jason of Pherae and Agathocles of Syracuse.
Modern scholars tend to add two other types:
-
The eastern tyrants. In the sixth to fourth centuries, many city states
in Asia Minor were part of the Achaemenid
or Persian empire and were ruled by one man (e.g., Aristagoras of Miletus),
who served as an intermediary between the city and the great king.
-
The western tyrants of the late sixth, early fifth centuries, to be found
in Sicily
and southern Italy. Using mercenary armies, people like Phalaris
of Acragas, Hippocrates
of Gela, and Gelon of Syracuse created political units that were larger
than the old city-states. In fact, this type is a predecessor of type #2.
What these people have in common is that their sole rule was unconstitutional,
and that, therefore, they had to justify their power. Usually, they claimed
to provide more efficient government than the traditional rulers. And indeed,
trade and commerce often benefited from the measures taken by tyrants,
so that it was possible to embark on large-scale building policies, which
also served as some sort of legitimization of the tyrant's power.
The negative connotation of the word originated
in fifth-century Athens, where the democrats more or less created the tyrant
as their anti-type. Writers like Herodotus
of Halicarnassus and Thucydides
make it clear that democrats thought that the power of tyrants was uncontrolled,
so that they easily became violent and mean despots, surrounded by sycophants.
Democracy, in this philosophy, was the exact opposite: people were free
to speak and power was controled and balanced.
|
Jona Lendering
© 2005
Latest revision: 31 March
2006
|